Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder (U.S. Sup. Ct. 2010)
In this case, the Supreme Court held that for purposes of cancellation of removal, an applicant must actually be convicted of an aggravated felony to be disqualified from seeking such relief. The case arose because the respondent, a lawful permanent resident, had been convicted in Texas of possessing without prescription of one tablet of Xanax, a common anti-anxiety drug. He served 10 days jail time for this conviction. Previously, he had been convicted of possession of less than three ounces of marijuana, for which he served 20 days in jail. Both convictions are classified as misdemeanors under both Texas and federal law drug laws. Following his second conviction, the government placed him in removal proceedings. He sought relief against removal pursuant to cancellation of removal. The government argued successfully before the immigration judge that the second drug conviction rendered the respondent ineligible for cancellation of removal because he may now be considered an aggravated felon on account of being convicted of two drug possession charges.